Featured Posts

Thanks for Nothing: Random Acts of Kindness and What... Over the past few months, I've been hearing about some self-confessing Christians doing, promoting and priding themselves for "random acts of kindness." Have you heard about these things? It is when...

Readmore

Sermon - Glued Together by One Gospel (Eph 4:1-6) This sermon, “Glued Together by One Gospel: Maintaining a House that Needs Renovation” (Ephesians 4:1-6) , was originally preached on Sunday, August 2, 2009 at North Toronto Chinese Baptist Church-Melville...

Readmore

Sermon - United through the Gospel: Once Separated,... This sermon, “United through the Gospel: Once Separated, Now United" (Ephesians 2:11-22) , was originally preached on Sunday, June 28, 2009 at English Worship Service of the North Toronto Chinese Baptist...

Readmore

Sermon - Loved in the Gospel: Pushing for More instead... This sermon, “Loved in the Gospel: Pushing for More instead of Cruising” (Ephesians 3:14-21) , was originally preached on Sunday, July 19, 2009 at English Worship Service of the North Toronto Chinese...

Readmore

Sermon - Saved by the Gospel: Becoming Trophies of... This sermon, “Saved by the Gospel: Becoming Trophies of God’s Amazing Grace" (Ephesians 2:1-10) , was originally preached on Sunday, June 7, 2009 at North Toronto Chinese Baptist Church-Melville Mission...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

The Emerging Church Movement

Posted on : 08-03-2006 | By : Alex S. Leung | In : Emergent, Reformed, Theology

2

Over the past year and increasingly over the past 6months, I’ve become more and more concerned about what it is and why even I should be concerned.  The movement, or conversation as many call it, is hard to define…but basically it is a rising concern of many in the church itself to “minister to the postmodern culture”.

The poster-child of this movement is a pastor named Brian McLaren, who has published most and is most popular and vocal in growing this movement.  Much controversy has risen because of the over-emphasis of orthopraxy over orthodoxy and the Emergents’ de-prioritization of the authority, inerrancy, and sufficiency of Scripture.  Hermeneutics of humility is uplifted, while the doctrine of perspecuity of God’s word and Biblical inerrancy is neglected.

What makes me significantly more concerned recently is that our church’s Young Adults Smallgroup is reading McLaren’s “A Generous Orthodoxy” and my Pastor is reading more and more McLaren.  At first glance, McLaren’s writtings are acceptable by the Christian mind, as reaching our culture with God’s love is our mission indeed.  However, this man-centeredness and lack of Biblical foundation througout is ultimately what scares me.  In reading emergent literature, we must also review it in light of the Bible and the traditional reformed doctrine that was derived from His Truth and transcended culture and time.

I do not assume to have fully wrapped my head around the emergents, nor would be so bold to say that they are wrong–but from what I’ve read and listened to, we missional evangelicals MUST continually filter this movement through the infallible, authoritative Word of God. And as this movement gains in popularity, we should indeed be increasingly concerned.

(Please note my bias as outlined in my bio)
 

Some resources I’ve found helpful:

The Master’s Seminary-2006 Faculty Lecture Series on “The Emerging Church Movement”
http://www.tms.edu/audio.asp?ministry_id=3&dlyear=-1&dlcat=Faculty+Lecture+Series&dlcat2=-1

A critical look at the emerging church movement, by Phil Johnson.
2006 Shepherds’ Conference:
http://emergentno.blogspot.com/2006/03/phil-johnson-critical-look-at-emerging.html

Review of Brian McLaren, A Generous Orthodoxy
by Dr. John M. Frame
http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/2005McLaren.htm

The Emerging Church
by D. A. Carson
Modern Reformation Magazine, “Faith a La Carte?”  (July / August 2005 Issue, Vol. 14.4).
http://www.modernreformation.org/dac05emerging.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergent_church
http://www.jesuscreed.org/?p=510
http://www.emergingchurch.info/
http://www.emergentvillage.com

Disciple first, leader second

Posted on : 03-03-2006 | By : Alex S. Leung | In : Reformed, Theology

0

“In holy and divine matters one must first hear rather than see,
first believe rather than understand,
first be grasped rather than grasp,
first be captured rather than capture,
first learn rather than teach,
first be a disciple rather than a teacher and master of his own. 
We have an ear so that we may submit to others,
and eyes that we may take care of others. 
Therefore, whoever in the church wants to become an eye and a leader and master of others,
let him become an ear and a disciple first. 
This first.”

(Martin Luther, First Lectures on the Psalms II, Works II.245-246).

~I’m waiting for class to start right now, and in trying to pass time I just came across this article my Pastor John Samson of Faith Community Church in Phoenix, Arizona on 10 FAQs on Election:

  1. What is meant by “Divine Election?”
  2. Isn’t the idea of election just another word for fatalism?
  3. Isn’t predestination based simply on God foreknowing those who will believe?
  4. What would be the point of evangelism if some people are “elect” and some are not and don’t have the free will to choose Christ?  Doesn’t this make evangelism a farce?
  5. Can you explain John 3:16? Doesn’t this imply no election, but rather free choice?
  6. We are all conscious of having our own free wills. How are we to understand the human will?
  7. Doesn’t John 12:32 teach that Christ is drawing everyone to Himself?
  8. How can I know if I am one of the elect?
  9. When all is said and done, isn’t Divine election unfair?
  10. If Election is true, can you explain 2 Peter 3:9, which says that God is not willing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance?

If you’ve ever struggled with these questions, or the like, I highly encourage you to have a read!  It’s Biblical and reformed–definitely strong foundational thruths for our faith.

Whatever will be…may not actually be

Posted on : 02-03-2006 | By : Alex S. Leung | In : Reformed, Theology, Worship

0

Doris Day sang a popular song entitled “Que Sera, Sera,”What will be, will be.” At first glance this theme communicates a kind of fatalism that is depressing. Islamic theology frequently says of specific events, “It is the will of Allah.”

The Bible is deeply concerned about the will of God—His sovereign authority over His creation and everything in it. When we speak about God’s will we do so in at least three different ways. The broader concept is known as God’s decretive, sovereign, or hidden will. By this, theologians refer to the will of God by which He sovereignly ordains everything that comes to pass. Because God is sovereign and His will can never be frustrated, we can be sure that nothing happens over which He is not in control. He at least must “permit” whatever happens to happen. Yet even when God passively permits things to happen, He chooses to permit them in that He always has the power and right to intervene and prevent the actions and events of this world. Insofar as He lets things happen, He has “willed” them in this certain sense.

Though God’s sovereign will is often hidden from us until after it comes to pass, there is one aspect of His will that is plain to us—His preceptive will. Here God reveals His will through His holy law. For example, it is the will of God that we do not steal; that we love our enemies; that we repent; that we be holy. This aspect of God’s will is revealed in His Word as well as in our conscience, by which God has written His moral law upon our heart.

His laws, whether they be found in the Scripture or in the heart, are binding. We have no authority to violate this will. We have the power or ability to thwart the preceptive will of God, though never the right to do so. Nor can we excuse ourselves for sinning by saying, “Que sera, sera.” It may be God’s sovereign or hidden will that we be “permitted” to sin, as he brings His sovereign will to pass even through and by means of the sinful acts of people. God ordained that Jesus be betrayed by the instrument of Judas’s treachery. Yet this makes Judas’s sin no less evil or treacherous. When God “permits” us to break His preceptive will, it is not to be understood as permission in the moral sense of His granting us a moral right. His permission gives us the power, but not the right to sin.

The third way the Bible speaks of the will of God is with respect to God’s will of disposition. This will describes God’s attitude. It defines what is pleasing to Him. For example, God takes no delight in the death of the wicked, yet He most surely wills or decrees the death of the wicked. God’s ultimate delight is in His own holiness and righteousness. When He judges the world, He delights in the vindication of His own righteousness and justice, yet He is not gleeful in a vindictive sense toward those who receive His judgment. God is pleased when we find our pleasure in obedience. He is sorely displeased when we are disobedient.

Many Christians become preoccupied or even obsessed with finding the “will” of God for their lives. If the will we are seeking is His secret, hidden, or decretive will, then our quest is a fool’s errand. The secret counsel of God is His secret. He has not been pleased to make it known to us. Far from being a mark of spirituality, the quest for God’s secret will is an unwarranted invasion of God’s privacy. God’s secret counsel is none of our business. This is partly why the Bible takes such a negative view of fortune-telling, necromancy, and other forms of prohibited practices.

We would be wise to follow the counsel of John Calvin when he said, “When God closes His holy mouth, I will desist from inquiry.” The true mark of spirituality is seen in those seeking to know the will of God that is revealed in His preceptive will. It is the godly person who meditates on God’s law day and night. While we seek to be “led” by the Holy Spirit, it is vital to remember that the Holy Spirit is primarily leading us into righteousness. We are called to live our lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. It is His revealed will that is our business, indeed, the chief business of our lives.

 

-Sproul, R.C. (1992) The Will of God.  Essentials Truths Of The Christian Faith.
Chapter 22, pages 67-69, Tyndale House.

Sola Fide: Justification by Faith alone

Posted on : 01-03-2006 | By : Alex S. Leung | In : Reformed, Theology

0

The doctrine of justification by faith alone does not imply that you are justified before God because you managed to work up enough faith in and by yourself to believe in Christ, which is impossible in the first place.  Rather, the doctrine contrasts faith against works, emphasizing that we are justified by God through faith apart from works. This faith is itself not a work — that is, not a work of man, but a work of God IN man.  FAITH IS A GIFT OF GOD purchased by Christ for all those whom God has chosen for salvation. It is a gift even though it has been purchased by our Mediator because it is God who sovereignly decreed to save us through this Mediator in the first place.  It is God who has sovereignly chosen those whom He would save by His grace through Christ, so that all of salvation is a gift of God — it is a sovereign gift of God, unmerited by man, that at the same time fully satisfies divine justice, since it has been merited by Christ. Thus salvation is from the grace of God alone, through the work of Christ alone, and by means of faith alone (that is, in contrast to works).

Therefore, when discussing the doctrine of justification by faith, we must NOT portray faith as a condition for salvation that God requires from us, as if we could produce faith in and of ourselves prior to regeneration and apart from the Spirit’s power. So, although it is correct to speak of faith as our necessary response to the gospel, this “response” of faith is in fact one of the very things that Christ’s atonement purchased for his elect, and that God bestows upon his chosen ones by his Spirit. In other words, God is the one who produces this response of faith in his elect.

When Scripture says that salvation is by faith and not by works, it is not throwing out works just to make faith a condition that man must fulfill in order to obtain salvation from God, although this is precisely how the doctrine is frequently but mistakenly portrayed, either by explicit statements or by implication. Faith is not a good work or a condition for salvation that God requires from us before He would do anything to save us; instead, God has already decreed and performed all that is necessary to secure the salvation of His chosen ones, and faith in the gospel is precisely one of those things that He has secured for the elect by the work of Christ, and that He sovereignly produces in their minds when He commands them to believe and summons them to himself by the gospel. There is therefore no place for boasting. Salvation comes from God through Christ alone. We cannot even boast about our faith, since it is a sovereign gift of God, merited by Christ for the elect. 

Source:
http://www.reformationtheology.com/2006/03/quote_on_justification_by_fait.php 

 

Calvin on Justification by Faith Alone 

The reader now perceives with what fairness the Sophists of the present day cavil at our doctrine, when we say that a man is justified by faith alone (Rom. 4:2). They dare not deny that he is justified by faith, seeing Scripture so often declares it; but as the word alone is nowhere expressly used they will not tolerate its being added. Is it so? What answer, then will they give to the words of Paul, when he contends that righteousness is not of faith unless it be gratuitous? How can it be gratuitous, and yet by works? By what cavils, moreover, will they evade his declaration in another place, that in the Gospel the righteousness of God is manifested? (Rom. 1:17). If righteousness is manifested in the Gospel, it is certainly not a partial or mutilated, but a full and perfect righteousness. The Law, therefore, has no part in its and their objection to the exclusive word alone is not only unfounded, but is obviously absurd. Does he not plainly enough attribute everything to faith alone when he disconnects it with works? What I would ask, is meant by the expressions, “The righteousness of God without the law is manifested;” “Being justified freely by his grace;” “Justified by faith without the deeds of the law?” (Rom. 3:21, 24, 28). Here they have an ingenious subterfuge, one which, though not of their own devising but taken from Origin and some ancient writers, is most childish. They pretend that the works excluded are ceremonial, not moral works. Such profit do they make by their constant wrangling, that they possess not even the first elements of logic. Do they think the Apostle was raving when he produced, in proof of his doctrine, these passages? “The man that does them shall live in them,” (Gal. 3:12). “Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law to do them,” (Gal. 3:10). Unless they are themselves raving, they will not say that life was promised to the observers of ceremonies, and the curse denounced only against the transgressors of them. If these passages are to be understood of the Moral Law, there cannot be a doubt that moral works also are excluded from the power of justifying. To the same effect are the arguments which he employs. “By the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin,” (Rom. 3:20). “The law worketh wrath,” (Rom. 4:15), and therefore not righteousness. “The law cannot pacify the conscience,” and therefore cannot confer righteousness. “Faith is imputed for righteousness,” and therefore righteousness is not the reward of works, but is given without being due. Because “we are justified by faith,” boasting is excluded. “Had there been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the Scripture has concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe,” (Gal. 3:21, 22). Let them maintain, if they dare, that these things apply to ceremonies, and not to morals, and the very children will laugh at their effrontery. The true conclusion, therefore, is, that the whole Law is spoken of when the power of justifying is denied to it.

-John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion; 3:11:19

Christ lived for our righteousness

Posted on : 21-02-2006 | By : Alex S. Leung | In : Reformed, Theology, Worship

0

I’m back from my last CCF Winter Retreat as a student, but am about to leave for Niagara with a few friends.   Winter Retreat this year was very solemn for me, simply because of I am currently in a Spiritual valley–a time of relatively reflective quietness, continual re-evaluation of all of life’s priorities, contemplation of what it means to embrace His Sovereign Grace. 

I’ll post more on what happened @ Retreat later…I’ve yet to have much time to reflect on the weekend, but for now, I just wanna share a devotional I read today, very fitting as Ash Wednesday and Lent approaches in about 8 days.

—-

Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to John, to be baptized by him. John would have prevented him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he consented. (Matthew 3:13-15, ESV)

He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, whom God made our wisdom and our righteousness and sanctification and redemption. Therefore, as it is written, “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”  (1 Corinthians 1:30-31, ESV)

CHRIST DIED FOR OUR SINS, AND LIVED FOR OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS - The Lord Jesus Christ not only died an atoning death for our sins, but He also lived a sinless life that perfectly fulfilled the righteous standards of the law. If all that was necessary for our justification was the death of Jesus on the cross, He could have come down to earth on a parachute on Good Friday, died on the cross for us, and three days later, risen again. But we all know that this is not what happened. Why? Because that would never have been enough.

The good news of the Gospel is certainly that Christ died for our sins.. but it also includes the fact that He lived for our righteousness. For more than 33 years, Christ was tempted in every way like us, yet He was without sin (Heb. 4:15). Christ is the only One who can say that He loved His Father perfectly in life, with all His heart, soul, mind and strength.

At the cross then, all our sins were laid on Him (though of course, He remained the holy and spotless Lamb of God, in and of Himself) and as our sin bearer, He was punished in our place. As the angel declared to Joseph in Matthew 1:21, “you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”

“He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree” (1 Pet. 2:24).

Isa 53:5, 6 says, “But He was pierced through for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; the chastening for our well-being fell upon Him, and by His scourging we are healed. All of us like sheep have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; but the LORD has caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him.”

But that is far from all of the story. There was a double imputation that took place on the cross. If Christ had merely paid the penalty for our sins, our debt to God would have been cancelled, and no punishment would be due to us, thank God! But that is not nearly enough to gain an entry into heaven. That would simply remove the outstanding debt we owed to God and bring us to zero… and zero is not enough. Jesus said, “Unless your righteousness (positive) exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees you shall in no way enter the kingdom of God.” (Matt. 5:20)

We as sinners not only need the removal of the negative (our sin) but the presence of the positive… full and complete righteousness to be able to stand before a holy God just in His sight. So not only were our sins imputed to Christ and He bore their full punishment for us on the cross, but positively, the righteousness of Christ was imputed to us. The punishment due to us because of our sin came upon Him, and the pleasure of God due to Jesus’ complete obedience to every jot and tittle of the law, came upon us. The very righteousness of Jesus Christ is the righteousness imputed to us by grace alone, through faith in Christ alone. This righteousness is one that has perfectly fulfilled the entire demands of the law of God.

The work of Christ is perfect in every respect, and perfect in every aspect. The righteousness now enjoyed by the believer is an alien one (one that comes from outside of himself) for it is the righteousness of Christ Himself. It comes to us as a gift, not something earned (Rom. 5:17), and is the cause of our rejoicing in the direct presence of the Lord. “For He (God) made Him (Jesus) who knew no sin, to become sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.” 2 Cor. 5:21. As believers in Christ, we’ve been made righteous with a righteousness that has never known sin, and has fully complied with all the righteous demands of the law. Hallelujah! What a Savior!

Source

Advertise Here