What’s the hurry?
I read this article @ CT and I cannot for the sake of me bring to mind any women I know who would date to have fun, date to learn, or date just to experience things. Everybody seems to date for the purpose of marrying. I cannot believe I am reforming my theology in the purpose of dating too… I truly, cannot believe it LOL! Am I really the only one considering to jump on the other boat?!
“You just said that we ought to date a lot of people to learn and grow and all that stuff, but I really disagree,” said a woman seated in the first row at one of my seminars. “I don’t have time for that.”
“What do you mean, ‘You don’t have time for that?’” I could tell the questioner was young and energetic. What could she mean that she didn’t have time for dating? Usually you hear that from someone worried about his or her age in some way, such as a man worrying about putting down roots or a woman worrying about her biological clock. Maybe that is what she meant, I thought.
“I don’t have time to waste on dating someone whom I couldn’t see myself marrying. If he doesn’t have the potential for a serious relationship that could lead to marriage, I don’t want to go out with him.”
“What’s your hurry?”
“Well, I’m forty-two, I’ve been married once before, and I want to be married again. I don’t have time to waste.”
“I don’t get it. You are only forty-two. It’s not like your life is over. What’s your hurry?”
“Well, I just don’t have time for all this dating. I only want to go out with someone I could marry. Isn’t that the purpose of dating? To find a mate?”
“NO! NO! NO!” I said, literally jumping up and down on the stage. If I could have screamed louder without breaking the microphone, I would have. “That is not the sole purpose of dating! Haven’t you heard anything I’ve said?”
“Well, I just couldn’t believe you were really serious about dating just for dating. I date to find a mate.”
I did not know any of the facts of her life. But I did know a lot from what she was saying. She was in a hurry, and on the hunt. That was easy enough to see. And that always means something. But past that, she was showing something else. It sounded like she thought she knew what she wanted and needed. I seriously doubted that.“So, tell me about the last ten years,” I said, picking a number out of the air. I wondered how her dating plan of action was going.
“Bad marriage and divorce,” she said.
This answer did not tell me a lot about her dating, so I pressed her. “How long have you been divorced?”
“It is not final yet. We ended it two weeks ago.”
The crowd gasped.
“What? Your divorce is not final, and you are already ‘in a hurry?’” I could hardly believe my ears, although I should have. I have seen this countless times. “So what you are telling me is this. The last time you chose someone, it ended in disaster. And you have chosen no one since him, right?” With only two weeks on the market, I assumed she had not been in another relationship.
“Right.”
“So you have made one choice for a mate, and it was a bad choice. Isn’t it obvious that your ‘people picker’ is broken? Now, with no further experience dating, you think you are ready to make another lifetime commitment with the same people picker you used to pick the last one. No, no, no! You are not ready to date to find a mate. You obviously do not know what you need, what is good and what is not good, and what your unhealthy patterns are. You are 0 for 1.
“The last thing you need is to date to find a mate. You need more than anyone to go out with many different kinds of men for a number of reasons. There is no way you are ready to think that you know what you need or what is good for you. The last ten years should have proven that to you. Make a commitment to not make a commitment. That is what you need to do. Go into divorce recovery. Get healing. Get therapy. But, please do not go out looking for another mate. That is the last thing you need.”
This is one of the biggest problems I’ve encountered in my work with singles and dating. Do not let the questioner’s recent divorce confuse the issue; I’m not talking about the need to avoid a rebound. The real issue here is what is the purpose of dating. One of the first steps people need is to be cured of the thinking that the purpose of dating is to find a marriage partner. This is often a result, obviously. But here is what I’m trying to say:
Dating is as much about learning what you need and want, and how you need to grow and change, as it is about finding the “right” person.
Look at it this way. Tiger Woods grew up with the goal of winning more major golf tournaments than anyone in history. He wanted to win more U.S. Opens, Masters, PGAs, and British Opens than Jack Nicklaus did. What if Tiger had said early on, “I will not play in any other tournament than the U.S. Open.” Ridiculous. What if any other athlete said, “I will only play in the Super Bowl, or the World Series.” That’s crazy. Or what if a medical student said, “I will only take the ultimate job in my life’s career? I will not work at anything less than that.” I would not want to go to that surgeon.
Some people approach dating like that. They think they know what they need, what they want, or who they need to be. We will see specific reasons why this is not true in upcoming chapters, but for now I want you to join me in taking a hard look at your dating philosophy. If you have seen it as only a search for the love of your life, then I want you to make some shifts in your thinking. I want you to see dating in a very, very different way.
From the co-author of “Boundaries in Dating”,
Dr. Henry Cloud’s How to Get a Date Worth Keeping


















Joeie Kung
MARRIAGE ONLY! MARRIAGE ONLY!
Haha kidding.
Mmh. Interesting article - I think maybe a different way of looking at Dr. Cloud’s discussion is for some people, dating is for marriage and the symptoms that result from it are “learning what you need and want, and how you need to grow and change…”.
Of course there are different reasons for dating, so there’s definitely tons of people wanting to date for different reasons, but specifically in regards to dating for marriage or even dating seriously…
… what Dr. Cloud gives as an example (the divorced woman) is a very extreme example. I doubt that normal, sane people like you and me are seriously that marriage-driven in the sense that regardless of everything, the bottom-line is that I WANT TO GET MARRIED. (ie. Being divorced two weeks prior, and already looking for somebody… c’mon!)
Of course when I date (once again, we’re talking about specifically dating-for-marriage idea), I want to eventually wind up in marriage with the person; why deposit money in the bank when you know you can never withdraw and will eventually have to end up closing the account?
Dating, learning, growing… it’s all a concurrent process. It’s not as if dating for marriage excludes learning from the process and vice versa. This all comes though, with the perspective that we enter and leave God-directed and God-blessed relationships for specific reasons - I don’t “believe” in the concept of “The One”, so maybe that’s part of it.
And definitely, learning and growing is more conducive in a relationship as intimate as a romantic one, but… bah. Anyways haha. I’m running out of comments. But yeah. Ditto everything I just said ;P
Jun 26, 2007 @ 9:32 pm
Alex Leung
I don’t how to respond to all that you’ve written, but thanks for your 3 cents!
I think this quote says it all:
Thus the author exhorts,
I think what Dr Cloud is suggesting is that we shouldn’t necessarily “deposit money in the bank”, as you would say. The thinking is that if we do, we would be investing in something that we may not necessarily know we WANT to be investing in, not certain of what we need/want & how much we can really invest.
I’ve never played squash. How would I really know where I like the sport (enough to invest additional time and money in it) unless I just start of playing casually, to figure out whether it’s my cup of tea OR NOT?!
That’s the kind of thing I’m thinking right now. We do have kind of have the same mindset. I don’t believe in The One either; I believe in “The Two”! — for Jesus is our One and Only
Jun 28, 2007 @ 8:34 am