When you have, you do not have the have not’s; when you have not, you do not have the have’s.

I find it very interesting that the very thing that seem to be simple, is actually very difficult to understand. I don’t think it’s a matter of have’s and have not’s, but rather the difference.

When you have, you have not, when you have not, you have?

Joeie: I shall hold you to you’re word & expect your response on relationships *In terms of the overseas, I think I’d choose to visit Darfur, Sudan and do some sort of relief work there. There is a dire need for the hands and feet of Christ to be in the midst of that dark place.

I was thinking I had more to say on this topic, but… my brain is a little tired right now, so maybe later? Relationship talk, esp. in the context of God/Christianity/godly relationships are always of high interest, so I’ll probably come back and share my thoughts on this later.

Anyways, thanks for your comment. It’s weird, I was so surprised to read your ideal destination, but wow - very well thought out. I think the “unknown”/”different” places ie. Africa are more appealing to the masses because well, it’s different! The grass always seems greener on the other side.