What is Calvinism?

For those of you who know me, like… really… you would know that I consider myself a “reformed” evangelical, and more specifically a, Calvinist.  I don’t live this orthodoxy generous, but I sincerely hope that I have and am living it humbly.  Thus after finding this article, I thought it would be beneficial and edifying to you–who may not understand what is “Calvinism”.  I could simply mention I believe in the “doctrines of grace”, something about my love for “tulip”, list the 5 solas in latin for you, or state for a fact that you can’t lose your salvation if you really have it… but I don’t think it would do just to our dear great grand father of our faith, John Calvin, who by the grace of God through faith received Divine Inspiration to take a stand and protest against the un-Biblical tenets of Roman Catholicism and Arminianism.

By the Spirit of God through the voice and writings of Calvin, the Protestant Reformation came to harvest.  If you go a Christian “church” but not a Roman Catholic Church, you have to thank Calvin for theological struggles he endured to show us “protestants” what Christianity should really be about–God Himself.

This is an article about just that–what it is that we believe in.  May it be edifying to you and glorifying to God.
-SDG

What is Calvinism - by Benjamin B. Warfield,
the last great Princeton theologian.

 

It is very odd how difficult it seems for some persons to understand just what Calvinism is. And yet the matter itself presents no difficulty whatever. It is capable of being put into a single sentence; and that, on level to every religious man’s comprehension. For Calvinism is just religion in its purity. We have only, therefore, to conceive of religion in its purity, and that is Calvinism.

In what attitude of mind and heart does religion come most fully to its rights? Is it not in the attitude of prayer? When we kneel before God, not with the body merely, but with the mind and heart, we have assumed the attitude which above all others deserves the name of religious. And this religious attitude by way of eminence is obviously just the attitude of utter dependence and humble trust. He who comes to God in prayer, comes not in a spirit of self-assertion, but in a spirit of trustful dependence.

No one ever addressed God in prayer thus: “0 God, thou knowest that I am the architect of my own fortunes and the determiner of my own destiny. Thou mayest indeed do something to help me in the securing of my purposes after I have determined upon them. But my heart is my own, and thou canst not intrude into it; my will is my own, and thou canst not bend it. When I wish thy aid, I will call on thee for it. Meanwhile, thou must await my pleasure.” Men may reason somewhat like this; but that is not the way they pray.

There did, indeed, once two men go up into the temple to pray. And one stood and prayed thus to himself (can it be that this “to himself” has a deeper significance than appears on the surface?), “God, I thank thee that I am not as the rest of men.” While the other smote his breast, and said, “God be merciful to me a sinner.” Even the former acknowledged a certain dependence on God; for he thanked God for his virtues. But we are not left in doubt in which one the religious mood was most purely exhibited. There is One who has told us that with clearness and emphasis.

The Calvinist is the man who is determined that his intellect, and heart, and will shall remain on their knees continually, and only from this attitude think, and feel, and act. Calvinism is, therefore, that type of thought in which there comes to its rights the truly religious attitude of utter dependence on God and humble trust in his mercy alone for salvation.

There are at bottom but two types of religious thought in the world — if we may improperly use the term “religious” for both of them. There is the religion of faith; there is the “religion” of works. Calvinism is the pure embodiment of the former of these; what is known in Church History as Pelagianism is the pure embodiment of the latter of them. All other forms of “religious” teaching which have been known in Christendom are but unstable attempts at compromise between the two. At the opening of the fifth century, the two fundamental types came into direct conflict in remarkably pure form as embodied in the two persons of Augustine and Pelagius. Both were expending themselves in seeking to better the lives of men. But Pelagius in his exhortations threw men back on themselves; they were able, he declared, to do all that God demanded of them — otherwise God would not have demanded it.

Augustine on the contrary pointed them in their weakness to God; “He himself,” he said, in his pregnant speech, “He himself is our power.” The one is the “religion” of proud self-dependence; the other is the religion of dependence on God. The one is the “religion” of works; the other is the religion of faith. The one is not “religion” at all — it is mere moralism; the other is all that is in the world that deserves to be called religion. Just in proportion as this attitude of faith is present in our thought, feeling, life, are we religious. When it becomes regnant in our thought, feeling, life, then are we truly religious. Calvinism is that type of thinking in which it has become regnant. This is why those who have caught a glimpse of these things, love with passion what men call “Calvinism,” sometimes with an air of contempt; and why they cling to it with enthusiasm. It is not merely the hope of true religion in the world: it is true religion in the world — as far as true religion is in the world at all.

For Calvinism, in this soteriological aspect of it, is just the perception and expression and defence of the utter dependence of the soul on the free grace of God for salvation. All its so-called hard features—its doctrine of original sin, yes, speak it right out, its doctrine of total depravity and the entire inability of the sinful will to good; its doctrine of election, or, to put it in the words everywhere spoken against, its doctrine of predestination and preterition, of reprobation itself—mean just this and nothing more. Calvinism will not play fast and loose with the free grace of God. It is set upon giving to God, and to God alone, the glory and all the glory of salvation. There are others than Calvinists, no doubt, who would fain make the same great confession. But they make it with reserves, or they painfully justify the making of it by some tenuous theory which confuses nature and grace. They leave logical pitfalls on this side or that, and the difference between logical pitfalls and other pitfalls is that the wayfarer may fall into the others, but the plain man, just because his is a simple mind, must fall into those. Calvinism will leave no logical pitfalls and will make no reserves. It will have nothing to do with theories whose function it is to explain away facts. It confesses, with a heart full of adoring gratitude, that to God, and to God alone, belongs salvation and the whole of salvation; that He it is, and He alone, who works salvation in its whole reach. Any falling away in the slightest measure from this great confession is to fall away from Calvinism. Any intrusion of any human merit, or act, or disposition, or power, as ground or cause or occasion, into the process of divine salvation,—whether in the way of power to resist or of ability to improve grace, of the opening of the soul to the reception of grace, or of the employment of grace already received—is a breach with Calvinism.

Is it strange that in this world, in this particular age of this world, it should prove difficult to preserve not only active, but vivid and dominant, the perception of the everywhere determining hand of God, the sense of absolute dependence on Him, the conviction of utter inability to do even the least thing to rescue ourselves from sin—at the height of their conceptions? Is it not enough to account for whatever depression Calvinism may be suffering in the world today, to point to the natural difficulty—in this materialistic age, conscious of its newly realized powers over against the forces of nature and filled with the pride of achievement and of material well-being—of guarding our perception of the governing hand of God in all things, in its perfection; of maintaining our sense of dependence on a higher power in full force; of preserving our feeling of sin, unworthiness, and helplessness in its profundity? Is not the depression of Calvinism, so far as it is real, significant merely of this, that to our age the vision of God has become somewhat obscured in the midst of abounding material triumphs, that the religious emotion has in some measure ceased to be the determining force in life, and that the evangelical attitude of complete dependence on God for salvation does not readily commend itself to men who are accustomed to lay forceful hands on everything else they wish, and who do not quite see why they may not take heaven also by storm?

Let us observe then, that Calvinism is only another name for consistent supernaturalism in religion. The central fact of Calvinism is the vision of God. Its determining principle is zeal for the divine honour. What it sets itself to do is to render to God His rights in every sphere of life-activity. In this it begins, and centres, and ends. It is this that is said, when it is said that it is Theism come to its rights, since in that case everything that comes to pass is viewed as the direct outworking of the divine purpose—when it is said that it is religion at the height of its conception, since in that case God is consciously felt as Him in whom we live and move and have our being—when it is said that it is evangelicalism in its purity, since in that case we cast ourselves as sinners, without reserve, wholly on the mercy of the divine grace. It is this sense of God, of God’s presence, of God’s power, of God’s all-pervading activity—most of all in the process of salvation—which constitutes Calvinism. When the Calvinist gazes into the mirror of the world, whether the world of nature or the, world of events, his attention is held not by the mirror itself (with the cunning construction of which scientific investigations may no doubt very properly busy themselves), but by the Face of God which he sees reflected therein. When the Calvinist contemplates the religious life, he is less concerned with the psychological nature and relations of the emotions which surge through the soul (with which the votaries of the new science of the psychology of religion are perhaps not quite unfruitfully engaging themselves), than with the divine Source from which they spring, the divine Object on which they take hold. When the Calvinist considers the state of his soul and the possibility of its rescue from death and sin, he may not indeed be blind to the responses which it may by the grace of God be enabled to make to the divine grace, but he absorbs himself not in them but in it, and sees in every step of his recovery to good and to God the almighty working of God’s grace.

The Calvinist, in a word, is the man who sees God. He has caught sight of the ineffable Vision, and he will not let it fade for a moment from his eyes—God in nature, God in history, God in grace. Everywhere he sees God in His mighty stepping, everywhere he feels the working of His mighty arm, the throbbing of His mighty heart. The Calvinist is therefore, by way of eminence, the supernaturalist in the world of thought. The world itself is to him a supernatural product; not merely in the sense that somewhere, away back before all time, God made it, but that God is making it now, and in every event that falls out. In every modification of what is, that takes place, His hand is visible, as through all occurrences His “one increasing purpose runs”. Man himself is His— created for His glory, and having as the one supreme end of his existence to glorify his Maker, and haply also to enjoy Him for ever. And salvation, in every step and stage of it, is of God. Conceived in God’s love, wrought out by God’s own Son in a supernatural life and death in this world of sin, and applied by God’s Spirit in a series of acts as supernatural as the virgin birth and the resurrection of the Son of God themselves—it is a supernatural work through and through. To the Calvinist, thus, the Church of God is as direct a creation of God as the first creation itself. In this supernaturalism, the whole thought and feeling and life of the Calvinist is steeped. Without it there can be no Calvinism, for it is just this that is Calvinism.

-

From Selected Shorter Writings of Benjamin B. Warfield, vol. 1, Edited by John E. Meeter, published by Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1970. originally from The Presbyterian, Mar. 2, 1904, pp. 6-7.

 

Let coffee be cofee

Grande Caramel Macchiato, extra hot, with extra caramel.  That’s how I like my latte macchiato, one my favorite drinks from Starbucks.. costs about $5 =D  And yes, I actually have my very own Starbucks Duetto Visa card!

But this post is not about coffee, though I am very picky about my macchiato being made quickly and precisely to Starbucks standard.  This post is about dating & relationships.

OOoooh! I should see readers flocking to read this post now!  LOL

My friend Kat (who’s in Taiwan right now) sent me a link to this recent article at Christianity Today by the same title.  Reading through it a couple times brought to life many of the dormant frustrations I have about dating in the Christian circle, and relationships at church, fellowship/CCF.

So often I’ve found myself and seen friends setting these rules up for ourselves.  “She must be ____” OR “he must be ____” this or that!  We set requirements for the kind of person we want to date / start an intimate relationship with.  And as the article mentions, both genders often subconciously or even consciously start daydreaming or fantasizing about the “future” when were about to go out on a casual get together with just another friend in Christ.  We overanalyze and overplan about possibilities that aren’t actually there, or we are too critical & confine ourselves to our list of accepted qualities.

If there is ever a list of requirements, is not found in Ephesians 5~sighs~ What more do we need to take that small step of being a better sister or brother to a fellow Christ follower.  As the article encourages, we should be less “cavalier with others’ feelings” and also not “totally unexcited about dating prospects.”  We need to let coffee be just coffee, and stop fooling ourselves about futile hypotheticals about fairy tales.

Life is too short to just let things be the way they are.  We live in times of reformation, and continually being reformed we definitely should be.  I for sure have become more Josh Harris-like in my charismatic conservativeness of dating.  But all things considered, we must stop playing these games, and just be honest with who we are and what we want.  We need to stopy pretending like life is or will be a fairy tale and live in the reality that when 2 people come together in relationship, both are sinners.  There’s no escaping the reality that one or the other is better or cleaner or less depraved than the other… We must stop ourselves right NOW from putting this misconception in our minds, that somehow, he or she could be the answer to our problems.  Coz they’re not the answer.

The answer is Christ.  We know all this.  We just gotta let our orthodoxy be our orthopraxy… and let our actions speak loudly as a testimony to what we believe in.

And so where this leaves us, is hopefully in a position where all of us, brothers and sisters in Christ, know that.  What to do now then?

For one, as I mentioned already, is to stop taking everything too seriously.  Stop thinking that we are giving somebody false hope, when coffee is just coffee and lunch is just lunch.  Let’s not lose out on the opportunities to build each other up in Christ, because of our fear that the other person might feel being led on.  May we be upfront and just say what we think and feel, to be less stubbourn / proud and more humble, more sacrificial and submissive to the sovereignty of God in our lives.  I am not saying that we shouyld compromise or get rid of the good standards about the kinds of people we want for a mate, but that since we already know that he or she is in Christ, then why not take a step of faith and become that body of Christ that seeks to glorify Him and edify each other in all that we do!?!

In the end, God has everything in His hands, within His control.  Why short-change ourselves and give up these chances to build good Christian friendships AND just let it all take its due course as God so wills?  We’ll even reap the benefits of less stress before outings, more interaction with each other.

Dating is quite the taboo subject in my Christian circle at church at least.  We don’t say what we mean, and hide our positions and feelings from each other, in fear of what others may think or react.  The disappointment is that we are all graduates, 22years old, young adults.  Why do we are we not open and honest about everything?  Why is it that all we talk about is “small talk”, work, work, the Jays, the weather, church, and work?  Why is it that there lacks a true community of faith?  We are all responsible, and I humbly know that I have not lived up to my part of the responsibility.  But forgive me please, I’m still struggling, I still hurt from past scars, and this | wall is a defense measure… which with due honesty and genuine conversation about the things that matter, it can be lowered and taken down.

I hope I’ve said something understandable LOL!  I am just fed up with the mind and heart games we Christians play with each other.  I’m tired of being scared or fearful of what others might think.  I just want to be led by the Spirit to love each other as brothers and sisters.  No alterior motives.  Let’s surrender it all in faith in order to build a true community of faith.

So what does this mean in terms of where I stand in this dating sphere?
I stand in the grace of Christ: in Him who gives me the ability to magnify Him and build each other up.

Phriday Photos

IMG_3754

I love this city :-)

Harmartiology, part 2

hamartiology

  1. A theological treatment of the doctrine of sin.
  2. The study of sin; it’s origin, nature, extent, and consequences.

The “sin” word that is used most frequently in the Bible is hamartia, “missing the mark“. It is the most comprehensive term for explaining sin. The Apostle Paul used the verb hamartano when he wrote, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). God has a high and holy standard of what is right, and so long as man follows the Divine standard he will see himself as he truly exists in God’s eyes. The flat statement of the Almighty is that all men have fallen far short of God’s required standard. It is the popular and common practice of men to create their own standards; however, God has established His standard of perfection for entry into Heaven, and all men have “missed the mark“.

God is not cruel and compassionless. He tells us that we “all have sinned,” all have missed the mark, and that if we confess to this fact, admitting that we have sinned, He will forgive and cleanse our sin and guarantee salvation in time and for eternity by accepting Jesus Christ as savior; and not by our “good works“.

Man’s original sin was disobedience to the command of God not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:17, 3:6). Sin brought shame and recognition of guilt (Genesis 3:10) and curses upon the man, woman, and the earth (Genesis 3:15-19).

Adam’s sin brought consequences upon all men, spiritual death and physical death (Genesis 2:17; Ephesians 2:1; Romans 5:12-14), and an inherited sin nature (Romans 5:12-21; Ephesians 2:3). Man is also an individual sinner (Romans 3:9-12, 23, 5:12). Therefore man in his condition is unable to produce a righteousness that will give him merit in God’s eyes (total depravity) (Romans 3:23; John 3:19). This does not mean man is as evil as he could be for he can get worse (Matthew 7:11).

(From WordInfo.info)

Some would say that Soteriology (the study of salvation) along with Harmartiology are complementary studies… simply stemming from the realization that God saves us because there is something for us to be saved from.  Thus, these 2 doctrines in the Christian faith are amongs the most fundamental in evangelicalism, if not all of Christianity.  You may or may not know it, but these 2 areas of study in Christianity are of utmost important to you, the individual Christian.  For to know what it means to be a Christian is to know what it means to be saved–and how you got to be.  In essence, as we become more coherent in our understanding of these 2 very important doctrines, we will consequently have a much greater appreciation on how you and I, sinners, became saints.

Furthermore, the better we understand how sinful we are, the better we can understand how holy God is (anthropology, theology proper).  To use more rhym-y modern words, David Crowder put it this way in his song “Wholly Yours”:

I am full of earth–You are heaven’s worth.
I am stained with dirt prone to depravity–
You are everything that is bright and clean.
The antonym of me: You are divinity.

To see the depths of our fall, we must turn back to Genesis chapter 3 to see where “original sin” originated (LOL that’s funny–putting the fun in fundamentalism!).  In the beginning, God gave Adam and Eve only ONE commandment (2:15-17): “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

“Indeed, has God said!??”  Satan is the craftiest beast of all, and tempted Eve, asking her if God really said they couldn’t eat from the Tree.  Eve tried to object, saying that indeed God said she and Adam were not allowed to eat or touch the Tree…but the Serpent did what it always does throughout all of human history: he lies to us.  He lied to Eve–that they wouldn’t die if they ate from It–and Eve believed him.  Crapollo–bad move.  Eve ate the lie, and gave to Adam, and He ate.  And from then on, ”the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked.” –they knew that they had sinned.  Mankind had fallen.

Some have asked, why did Satan tempt Eve and not Adam?  I myself am a complimentarian–and agree with the Apostle Paul: Eve was not the head of the household.  In tempting Eve, and as Eve accepted his lie–the order was kicked out of balance… authority was rejected.  The created put the Creator under its own subjection.  Before any sin was even committed by Eve or Adam, the tables were turned, and the stage was set–God’s original design was thwarted by the Serpent and His authority was outright objected to.  The Serpent tempts Eve, Eve eats of the fruit, and her eyes were opened to good and evil…and she gives to Adam to eat, just as the Serpent knew she would, and Adam eats.  Original sin.

As it says in Romans 5, that was the fall of mankind:

12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned— 13 for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

Now how far did we actually fallWhat exactly did we inherit from original sin through Adam & Eve?  Cause God forbid, I’m really not that sinful in nature, or am I?
The answer, coming soon, in part 3…

 

How did you get to me?

Chances are that who this is about won’t read this… and so I feel more free to say this.

Don’t misread the silence and take my distance as a sign;
There’s only one heart that’s confused, and it’s most likely mine.
I always make the rules, and I change ‘em all the time;
Always stayed a step ahead, until you looked in my eyes…

My thoughts are frozen, can’t you hear me screaming inside;
As you come closer, don’t know where to run this time.

I feel weak–I’m never weak–I always know what to say.
Don’t look at me–I can’t speak–how did you get to me this way?

All I know is what I feel, and what I feel is way too real.
Who I am is what you see–how did you ever get to me?

It could be so easy, if you’d make just one mistake;
Then I won’t feel the way I do, and I’ll say it’s fate.

But this emotion I keep tryin’ to leave behind,
Keeps getting closer–don’t know where to run this time…
 

Why MacArthur loves the church

On Wednesday June 21, 2006 Pastor John MacArthur writes on his church’s blog (Pulpit Live): 

In the 15 July 1998 issue of Christianity Today included an article by Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School at Samford University: “What I’d Like to Tell the Pope About the Church.” The article’s subtitle: “Responding to the main criticism Catholics have against evangelicals: that we have no doctrine of the church.” Dr. George quoted from a sermon by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in which Bonhoeffer noted that the word churchto Protestants has the sound of something infinitely commonplace, more or less indifferent and superfluous, that does not make their heart beat faster; something with which a sense of boredom is so often associated.”

Let’s be honest: there is too much truth in those criticisms to dismiss them lightly. Evangelicals are far too prone to indifference about the church. Some evangelicals live on the periphery of the church, attending and observing without ever really becoming an integral part of the body. Many who profess faith in Christ remain totally impassive about the church.  …

He’s right. Worse yet, I know of people in full-time Christian service, employed by evangelical parachurch organizations, who have no involvement whatsoever with any local church. This is to the shame of the whole evangelical movement.

Of course, the remedy for evangelical apathy about the church is not a return to the twisted, extrabiblical ecclesiology of the Roman Catholic Church. Evangelical Protestants must approach ecclesiology as they have soteriology—from the perspective of Scripture alone. Unfortunately even among many Protestants, too many of the popular notions about the church are laden with human traditions, superstitions, and other holdovers from the medieval Catholic Church. Scripture alone can give us a sound understanding and appreciation of the true role and nature of the church.

On Friday June 23 MacArthur began explaining why he loves the church: because…

1. It Is Being Built by the Lord Himself

The church is the New Testament counterpart of the Old Testament Temple. I’m not referring to a church building, but the body of all true believers.

It is a spiritual building (1 Pet. 2:5), the dwelling-place of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16-17; 2 Cor. 6:16), the place where God’s glory is most clearly manifest on earth, and the proper nucleus and focal point of spiritual life and worship for the community of the redeemed.

God Himself is the architect and builder of this temple. (See Ephesians 2:19-22) …

Notice also that the church is a work in progress. Christ is still building His church. We are still being joined together (Eph. 2:21). The church is still under construction (v. 22). God is not finished yet. The imperfections and blemishes in the visible church are still being refined by the Master Builder.

And here’s something remarkable: The plan for the finished product is a blueprint that was drawn in eternity past.

On Monday June 26 MacArthur continues:

2. The Church Is the Outworking of an Eternal Plan

In Titus 1:2, the apostle Paul writes of the “eternal life which God, who cannot lie, promised before time began” (NKJV). In this context, the apostle Paul was describing his ministry, a ministry of evangelism and salvation “for the faith of those chosen of God”—the church (v. 1).

And as Paul describes his ministry, he outlines God’s redemptive purpose, from election (”those chosen of God,” v. 1), to salvation (”the knowledge of the truth,” v. 1), to sanctification (”which is according to godliness,” v.1), to final glory (”in the hope of eternal life,” v. 2). All of this is God’s work (cf. Rom. 8:29-30), something He “promised before time began.”

In other words, in eternity past, before anything was created—before time began—God determined to begin and to finish His redemptive plan. People were chosen. Their names were written down that they might be brought to faith, to godliness, and to glory. God “promised” this before time began.

As it’s written in  2 Timothy 1:9 and Titus 1:2, Paul says God’s eternal purpose—this same promise that was made before the beginning of time—”was given to us in Christ Jesus.” The eternal pledge of our salvation, the divine covenant of redemption, involved a promise made by the Father to the Son before time began. …

…the importance of the doctrine of election emerges from all this. The redeemed are chosen and given to the Son by the Father as a gift. If you are a believer, it is not because you are more clever than your unbelieving neighbors. You did not come to faith through your own ingenuity. You were drawn to Christ by God the Father (John 6:44, 65). And every individual who comes to faith is drawn by God and given as a love gift from the Father to the Son, as part of a redeemed people—the church—promised to the Son before time began. …

Now this eternal promise involved a reciprocal promise from the Son to the Father. Redemption was by no means the Father’s work alone. In order to accomplish the divine plan, the Son would have to go into the world as a member of the human race and pay the penalty for sin. And the Son submitted completely to the Father’s will. That is what Jesus meant in John 6:38-39: “I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day.”

(See Hebrews 10:4-9)  So the Son submitted to the Father’s will, demonstrating His love for the Father. And the building of the church is therefore not only the Father’s expression of love to the Son, but also the Son’s expression of love to the Father.

…This is a mind-boggling look at our future. This is God’s plan for the church. We are a people called out for His name, redeemed, conformed to His Son’s image, made to be an immense, incomprehensible, all-surpassing expression of love between the Persons of the Trinity. The church is the gift that is exchanged. This is God’s eternal plan for the church. We ought to be profoundly grateful, and eager, and thrilled to be a part of it.

On Wednesday June 28 MacArthur continues, that he loves the church because

3. The Church Is the Most Precious Reality on Earth

There’s a third biblical reason I love the church: It is the most precious thing on this earth—more precious than silver, or gold, or any other earthly commodity.

How precious is the church? It demanded the highest price ever paid for anything. “You have been bought with a price” (1 Cor. 6:20). What price? “You were not redeemed with perishable things like silver or gold from your futile way of life inherited from your forefathers, but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ” (1 Pet, 1:18-19). Acts 20:28 refers to “the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.”

The church is so precious that the Son was willing to suffer the agonies of the cross and die in obedience to the Father so that this eternal love gift could become a reality…

2 Corinthians 8:9: Christ became bleed & died, giving up His own glorious riches so that we might become rich. His dying made us heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ (Rom. 8:17). In other words, in giving up His heavenly riches, Christ made it possible for the church to share in those riches. That makes the church the most precious thing on earth.

And finally on Sunday July 2 MacArthur concludes that we should love the church because

4. The Church Is an Earthly Expression of Heaven

I don’t mean that the church is perfect, or that it offers some kind of utopian escape from the realities of a sinful world. But I mean that the church is the one place where all that occurs in heaven also occurs on earth.

Christ instructed us to pray, “Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven” (Matt. 6:10). In what sphere is that most likely to occur? In the United States Congress? Not likely. In the Supreme Court? Probably not. In the university? No. City Hall? Don’t count on it.

Where is God’s will done on earth as it is in heaven? Only in one place, and that is the church.

What goes on in heaven? If all the activities of heaven were to be brought to earth, what activities would predominate?

First of all, worship. In every biblical description where men of God had visions of heaven, the one thing that stands out most is worship. Praise, adoration, and devotion are constantly being offered to God in heaven (Isaiah 6:1-3; Revelation 4:8-11; 1 Corinthians 14).

A second activity of heaven is the exaltation of Christ. Having finished His earthly work, Christ is now seated at the Father’s right in glory in pure exaltation (Acts 5:31). God Himself has exalted His Son, and given Him a name above every name (Phil. 2:9). Christ is “exalted above the heavens” (Heb. 7:27). And throughout all eternity we will be occupied exalting His name (cf. Rev. 5:11-14). Meanwhile, the church is the one sphere on earth where Christ’s name is truly and genuinely exalted.

A third activity that takes place in heaven is the preservation of purity and holiness. Heaven is a holy place. Revelation 21:8 says “the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars” are excluded from heaven, consigned instead to the lake of fire. Revelation 22:14-15 underscores the perfect purity of heaven’s inhabitants… No one is admitted to heaven who is not holy (Heb. 12:14).

Likewise, the church on earth is charged with preserving purity within her own midst. Matthew 18:15-20 lays out a process of discipline by which the church is to keep herself pure, if necessary through excommunication of members… take note of the promise Christ makes in verse 18: “Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.”

Another activity of heaven that occurs in the church is the fellowship of the saints. Our fellowship in the church on earth is a foretaste of the perfect communion we will enjoy in heaven.

The church, then, is like an earthly expression of heaven. It is the closest we can get to heaven on earth.

The apostle Paul wrote of “the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). More than any other institution on earth, the church is where the truth of God is upheld. The church is called to lift up the truth and hold it high. Employing the truth as a weapon, we are to smash the ideological fortresses of Satan’s lies (2 Cor. 10:3-5). And it is in the pursuit of that goal that the church will ultimately realize her greatest triumph.

All of that is why I love the church.

Ahh… loving words from a pastor who speaks the truth in love.  We love God whole-heartedly and each other as ourselves–because He first loved us and gave Himself up for us.

How much more are we to love OURSELVES as the gift of love between the Trinity!  Amazing thoughts, mind-blowing notions.  Church–the most precious thing on this earth :)

James M. Boice once said, “People tend to overestimate how much they can accomplish in five years, and underestimate how much they can achieve in twenty.” While Mark Dever exhorts, “Teach and pray, love and stay.”  Teach the people; pray faithfully for the people; love the people; and stay with the people.  It is true indeed, that this is the “kind of patience that believes teaching God’s word is effective, that prayer is necessary, and that a loving and long-term relationship between pastors and congregations tends to produce far more fruit, lasting fruit, when men stay in a pastorate rather than flitting between churches every few years.”  (Pastor Thabiti Anyabwile)

Censorship

For the love of God and others, I have been forced to censor my last post that was originally found here.

But for the love of the unbelieving, should the Spirit compell you to desire to read the original post–contact me & I’ll fwd you a digital copy.

Meanwhile, let us consider this 5 part series from John MacArthur about why he loves the church.

-SDG
^And if you don’t know what those 3 initials mean, look it up ;-)